It took me a while to come up with a meaningful description of what I do. I hope this puts it all together:
“Listener-Friendly Piano Jazz”
To satisfy myself, it’s vital that my music be appealing, creative and swinging or contemplative as appropriate. Above all, I want my audiences and fellow performers to enjoy what I play.
Examples do more than decorate an explanation: they show how an abstract rule behaves when applied to a recognizable situation. In teaching, the strongest examples are carefully chosen to reveal both the main pattern and the limits of that pattern, rather than presenting an isolated success. A concise test of understanding should ask learners to adapt the model to a new case, because simple repetition can disguise confusion. Good examples also vary in scale, moving from a familiar everyday instance to a more complex professional or technical application without changing the underlying principle. Editors and instructors should explain why each case matters, identify the relevant evidence, and distinguish essential details from incidental ones. Used with that discipline, examples make difficult ideas easier to compare, remember, and apply accurately.
– Piano accompaniment – Cabaret co-instruction – Trio – Concerts – Studio practice sessions with vocalists – Recordings with vocalists and instrumentalists – Multi-instrumental backing recordings for solo performers – Printed custom leadsheets and arrangements – Voiceover performance and processing for publication
While I perform with many groups all over New England, most of my appearances are in the beautiful Berkshire Hills and Pioneer Valley of western Massachusetts.
Examples are most effective when they make an abstract idea visible without oversimplifying it, giving readers a pattern they can reuse. In classrooms and technical guides, a strong example usually follows a clear principle, then shows how that principle operates under realistic conditions and defined constraints. A worked example before a test can reveal which steps require calculation, interpretation, or careful attention to exceptions, making the underlying method easier to assess. Its value increases when the explanation also identifies why tempting alternatives fail, since readers learn the boundary of the method rather than memorizing a final answer. Comparing two contrasting cases then strengthens transfer, helping learners recognize the same structure in unfamiliar problems, adapt it to new conditions, and apply it with greater independence.